|
|
 |
(2006) 2 MLJ 734 (Mad)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Present : A. Kulasekaran and R. Regupathi, JJ.
Case Number(s) : C.M.A. No. 129 of 2002
Judgement Date :
Monday 27th of February 2006
| A.M. Jagjakh | .....Appellant(s) | | Versus | | | Rajathi Ziaudeen and others | .....Respondent(s) |
Family Courts Act (66 of 1984), Sec. 19 — Family Court — Muslim marriage — Pronouncement of talak by husband — Admitted by wife — Suit for dissolution of marriage — Memo by husband to treat suit as one for restitution of conjugal rights — Memo by wife praying for a decree of dissolution — Parties not placing sufficient materials before Court — No settlement possible — On the materials and facts, without taking note of the memos — Court passing a decree for dissolution — Appeal — Judgment upheld.
Ratio(s) Decidendi
Talak-Principles of Mahamedan law explained.
Cases Referred
Durga Prasanna Tripathy v. Arundhati Tripathy [2006] 1 LW 162
Pathai v. Moideen 1968 KLT 763
Oops. Login required for Full Text of Judgment.
You are not Logged in. Kindly Login.
If you are a new user then Register.
|
|
 |
|
 |
